The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the costs of nursery production depending on the applied production technology (bare−root/field, tunnel, and container systems), as well as to assess the statistical significance of differences in cost levels among these technologies. The study was based on accounting data from the years 2018−2024 obtained from the State Forests Information System (SILP). The analysis covered 55 nursery holdings operating under three production technologies. The cost structure was examined by type of expense, while direct costs were analysed according to cost centres (CC). Differences between production technologies were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s post−hoc test with Bonferroni correction. Within the cost structure of nursery production, services (46.5−59.8%) and material consumption (26.1−29.5%) were the dominant components. The highest share of depreciation was observed in the container production system (15.9%). Over the analysed period, production costs exhibited a clear upward trend, while the level of seedling production remained relatively stable. The highest average production costs per unit of production area were recorded in the container system (on average 18 517 PLN per are), followed by the tunnel system (7 705 PLN per are), and the lowest in the field system (1 876 PLN per are). The Kruskal−Wallis test indicated statistically significant differences between the analysed production technologies (p<0.001). The obtained results demonstrate that both the structure and the level of nursery production costs are strongly determined by the applied production technology, as well as by the share of labour and infrastructure maintenance costs in the production process.

Barzdajn, W. and Urbański, K. (1997). Znaczenie warunków ekologicznych w produkcji sadzonek drzew leśnych [The importance of ecological conditions in the production of forest tree seedlings]. Sylwan, 141(4), 85-94.
Benedito, D., Coelho, K.C., de Novaes, A.B., Cipriani, V.B., de Aguiar, N.S. and da Silva, L.F. (2025). Economic feasibility and Monte Carlo simulation in a nursery for native forest species seedling production in the southwest region of Bahia, Brazil. Floresta, 55(1), e89586. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v55i1.89586.
Brumfield, R.G., Hall, C.R. and Ingram, D.L. (2015). Economics of utilizing alternative containers in ornamental crop production systems. HortTechnology, 25(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.25.1.17.
Buraczewski, A., Jarosz, K., Kot, R. and Paszkiewicz, A. (2008). Podstawy rachunkowości i gospodarki finansowej w Lasach Państwowych. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Poznaniu.
Ersson, B.T., Sundblad, L.G. and Manner, J. (2022). Cost analysis of seedling supply systems adapted for mechanized tree planting: a case study from southern Sweden. Silva Fennica, 56(2), 10663. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10663.
Frem, M., Fucilli, V., Petrontino, A., Acciani, C., Bianchi, R. and Bozzo, F. (2022). Nursery plant production models under quarantine pests’ outbreak: Assessing the environmental implications and economic viability. Agronomy, 12(12), 2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12122964.
Fulcher, A., Rihn, A.L., Warner, L.A., LeBude, A.V., Schexnayder, S., Altland, J.E., Bumgarner, N., Marble, S.C., Nackley, L., Palma, M., Velandia, M., Zhu, H., Gan, H. and Owen, J.S. (2023). Overcoming the nursery industry labor shortage: A survey of strategies to adapt to a reduced workforce and automation and mechanization technology adoption levels. HortScience, 58(12), 1513-1525. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI17230-23.
Grossnickle, S.C. and Ivetić, V. (2017). Direct seeding in reforestation – A field performance review. Reforesta, 4, 94-142. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.4.07.46.
Haase, D.L., Bouzza, K., Emerton, L., Friday, J.B., Lieberg, B., Aldrete, A. and Davis, A.S. (2021). The high cost of the low-cost polybag system: A review of nursery seedling production systems. Land, 10(8), 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080826.
Hall, C.R. (2024). Costs associated with mitigating boxwood blight during nursery production in the U.S. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 42(4), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-42.4.165.
Ingram, D.L., Hall, C.R. and Knight, J. (2017). Comparison of three production scenarios for Buxus microphylla var. japonica ‘Green Beauty’ marketed in a No. 3 container on the west coast using life cycle assessment. HortScience, 52(3), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI11596-16.
Kocira, S. (2005). Wykorzystanie maszyn rolniczych w gospodarstwach o różnej wielkości ekonomicznej. Problemy Inżynierii Rolniczej, 3(49), 15-22.
Kożuch, A. (2022). How unit costs of conducting forestry vary with the natural and economic conditions of forests in eastern Poland. Sylwan, 166(9), 551-565. https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2022046.
Morkovina, S., Kunickaya, O., Dolmatova, L., Markov, O., Nguyen, V., Baranova, T., Shadrina, S. and Grin’ko, O. (2021). Comparative analysis of economic aspects of growing seedlings with closed and open root systems: the experience of Russia. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 18(2), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW210015.
Nikulin, M., Ivannikov, V., Samojlenkov, S. and Asmolovskiy, M. (2023). Assessing the feasibility of using tillers and mini-tractors for mechanizing work in forest nurseries. Forestry Engineering Journal, 13(3), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2023.3/11.
Raupp, P.P., Ferreira, M., Alves, M., Campos Filho, E.M., Sartorelli, P., Consolaro, H. and Vieira, D.L.M. (2020). Direct seeding reduces the costs of tree planting for forest and savanna restoration. Ecological Engineering, 148, 105788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105788.
Rihn, A., Knuth, M., Peterson, B., Torres, A., Campbell, J., Boyer, C., Palma, M. and Khachatryan, H. (2022). Investigating drivers of native plant production in the United States green industry. Sustainability, 14(11), 6774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116774.
Rozporządzenie. (1994). Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 6 grudnia 1994 r. w sprawie szczegółowych zasad gospo-darki finansowej w Państwowym Gospodarstwie Leśnym Lasy Państwowe. Dz.U. 1994 nr 134 poz. 692
Sadowska, B. (2021). The costs and cost accounting model (simplified) in State Forests National Forest Holding. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 45(3), 233-253. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.2353.
Simőes, D., Gil, J.F.S., Gomes da Silva, R.B., Munis, R. and da Silva, M.R. (2021). Stochastic economic analysis of investment projects in forest restoration involving containerized tree seedlings in Brazil. Forests, 12(10), 1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101381.
Słowiński, K. (2011). Ocena parametrów eksploatacyjno-ekonomicznych wyorywacza szkółkarskiego SR 2. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 6(131), 197-205.
Varol, T., Özel, H., Emir, T. and Özdil, R. (2019). Efficiency comparison of mechanization techniques in nursery. European Journal of Forest Engineering, 5(2), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.581652.
Walczyk, J. and Tylek, P. (2012). Technical and technological progress in Polish forest nurseries. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Industria Lignaria, 11(4), 45-55.
Zastocki, D. and Kaliszewski, A. (2021). Koszty ponoszone przez Lasy Państwowe na realizację wybranych zadań z zakresu nasiennictwa i selekcji oraz hodowli lasu przez zakłady usług leśnych [Costs incurred by the State Forests for the selected tasks in the field of seed production and selection, and silviculture carried out by private forestry companies]. Sylwan, 165(10), 703-715. https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2021064.
Zarządzenie. (2020). Zarządzenie Nr 78 Dyrektora Generalnego Lasów Państwowych z dnia 17 grudnia 2020 r. zmieniające Zarządzenie nr 76 Dyrektora Generalnego Lasów Państwowych z dnia 10 grudnia 2019 r. w sprawie wprowa-dzenia jednolitego tekstu Zasad (polityki) rachunkowości Państwowego Gospodarstwa Leśnego Lasy Państwowe i Planu Kont z komentarzem Państwowego Gospodarstwa Leśnego Lasy Państwowe (Znak: EG.0210.4.2019). Biuletyn Informacyjny Lasów Państwowych, 1 poz. 11.