Barriers to burn: Quantifying the impact of fire and fuel breaks in UK wildfire
Bariery przeciwpożarowe: określenie jakości i wpływu pasów przeciwpożarowych na zarządzanie pożarami lasów w Wielkiej Brytanii
Sylwan 170 (2):93-108, 2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2025070Available online: 2026-05-24
Open Access (CC-BY)
fire ptotection • fire danger • fire protection • forest • forest roads • safety
The creation and maintenance of wildfire control measures in areas of woodland, heathland, moorland and grassland are necessary to minimise the losses caused by wildfire incidents, to prevent or reduce the spread of fire to other areas and to facilitate the fire suppression work of responders. Such measures keep wildfires small and increase the success of suppressing larger wildfires. However, in the UK, the scientific basis for these measures is very poor. To redress this deficiency, fundamental analysis of the status and capability of fire/fuel breaks and fire belts was undertaken in England and Wales. Data from surveys of the width of breaks and belts at 55 sites were analysed using a fuel model to provide data on the length of flames based on an extreme but realistic climatic scenario. The analyses were carried out for four different fire examples: (1) fire occurring near roads (fuel breaks), (2) fire occurring near tracks and paths (fuel breaks), (3) fire that occurs in adjacent vegetation including fire/fuel breaks but not fire belts, and (4) fire that occurs in adjacent vegetation and fire belt, and includes fire/fuel breaks. The analysis of fire behaviour considered the use of hand tools, and vehicle−mounted high pressure/low volume water pumps, to suppress fires. The average height and/or fuel model of the vegetation was also taken into account. Of the 55 fire and/or fuel breaks studied, 18 were not sufficient to provide effective passive or active containment of wildfires. From the modelling approach used, the management of fuel loading of vegetation adjacent to fire and/or fuel breaks is a critical factor in the effective of these prevention measures. The study identified minimum widths of fire/fuel breaks and fire belts for a range of habitat types, to allow safe and effective fire suppression.
Albini, F.A. (1976). Estimating wildfire behaviour and effects. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-30. Available from: https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_series/int/gtr/int_gtr030.pdf [accessed: 12.09.2025].
Andrews, P.L. (2018). The Rothermel surface fire spread model and associated developments: a comprehensive explanation. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-371. Fort Collins: USDA. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-371.
Arnell, N.W, Freeman, A. and Gazzard, R. (2021). The effect of climate change on indicators of fire danger in the UK. Environmental Research Letters, 16, 044027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd9f2.
Atkinson, G., Morison, J. and Nicoll, B. (2022). Adapting forest and woodland management to the changing climate. UK Forestry Standard Practice Guide. Edinburgh: Forest Research. Available from: https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2022/05/UKFSPG026.pdf [accessed: 10.11.2025].
Aubard, V., Pereira-Pires, J.E., Campagnolo, M.L., Pereira, J.M.C., Mora, A. and Silva, J.M.N. (2020). Fully automated countrywide monitoring of fuel break maintenance operations. Remote Sensing, 12(18), 2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12182879.
Berry, P. and Brown, I. (2021). National environment and assets. In: R.A. Betts, A.B. Haward, K.V. Pearson, eds. The third UK climate change risk assessment technical report. London: Climate Change Committee. Available from: https://www.ukclimaterisk.org/publications/technical-report-ccra3-ia/chapter-3/ [accessed: 20.10.2025].
British Standards Institution EN ISO 15384:2020+A1:2021 (2021). Protective clothing for firefighters. Laboratory test methods and performance requirements for wildland firefighting clothing. London: British Standards Institution.
Byram, G.M. (1959). Combustion of forest fuels. In: K.P. Davis, ed. Forest fire: Control and use. New York: McGraw-Hill, 61-89.
Clutterbuck, B. (2023). Three wildfires in England. Best practice and lessons learned. Natural England Commissioned Report NECR484. Available from: https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/file/6080895375900672 [accessed: 29.08.2025].
Crawford, A.J., Belcher, C.M., Morison, J.I.L., Doerr, D.H., Kettridge, N. and Clay, G.D. (2025). Fuel moisture and flammability of leaf litter in British forest plantations and their implications for wildfire risk. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, cpaf029. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaf029.
D’Evelyn, S.M., Jung, J., Alvarado, E. et al. (2022). Wildfire, smoke exposure, human health, and environmental justice need to be integrated into forest restoration and management. Current Environmental Health Report, 9(3), 366-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00355-7.
Dent, J.M, Buckley, H.L., Lustig, A. and Curran, T.J. (2019). Flame temperatures saturate with increasing dead material in Ulex europaeus, but flame duration, fuel consumption and overall flammability continue to increase. Fire, 2(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire2010006.
DGLP, 2020. Instrukcja ochrony przeciwpożarowej lasu. Warsaw: Directorate General of the State Forests. Available from: https://www.lasy.gov.pl/pl/publikacje/copy_of_gospodarka-lesna/ochrona_lasu/instrukcja_p-poz.pdf [accessed: 27.11.2025] .
FAO (2024). Integrated fire management voluntary guidelines – Principles and strategic actions. Second edition. Forestry Working Paper. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd1090en.
Fire Brigades Union (2023). Scorched: Firefighter and resilience to wildfire. Fire Brigades Union. Available from: https://www.fbu.org.uk/publications/scorched-firefighters-and-resilience-wildfires [accessed: 23.09.2025].
FireInSite (2025). FireInSite fire behaviour prediction tool. Swansea University. Available from https://www.fireinsite.org [accessed: 16.09.2025].
Forestry Commission (2014). Building wildfire resilience into forest management planning. Practice Guide. Edinburgh, Forestry Commission. Available from: https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/publications/building-wildfire-resilience-into-forest-management-planning/ [accessed: 10.09.2025].
Forestry Commission (2023). Wildfire investigation project report. Bristol: Forestry Commission. Available from: https://www.uk-afi.org/media/64e8c7b1b9dea/Wildfire%20investigation%20project%20report%20April%202023.pdf [accessed: 23.10.2025].
FRAMES (2025). Fire Research and Management Exchange System. Behave. Available from: https://www.frames.gov/catalog/7118 [accessed: 02.12.2025].
Gannon, B., Wei, Y., Belval, E., Young, J., Thompson, M., O’Connor, C., Calkin, D. and Dunn, C. (2023). A quantitative analysis of fuel break effectiveness drivers in Southern California National Forests. Fire 6(3), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6030104.
Glaves, D.J. Crowle, A.J.W., Bruemmer, C. and Lenghan, A. (2020). The causes and prevention of wildfire on heathlands and peatlands in England. Natural England Evidence Review NEER014. Peterborough: Natural England. Available from: https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/file/6728162266578944 [accessed: 05.11.2025].
Hasenauer, H., Neman, R., Schadauer, K. and Running, S.W. (1999). Forest growth response to changing climate between 1961 and 1990 in Austria. Forest Ecology Management, 122(3), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00010-9.
Hetzer, J., Forrest, M., Ribalaygua, J., Prado-López, C. and Hickler, T. (2024). The fire weather in Europe: Large-scale trends towards higher danger. Environmental Research Letters 19, 084017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5b09.
IUCN UK (2024). Peatland Programme Wildfire resilience: Why rewetting peatlands must play a key role. UK: The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) National Committee. Available from: https://live-twt-d8-iucn.pantheonsite.io/sites/default/files/2025-06/Wildfire%20Resilience%20%281%29.pdf [accessed: 02.09.2025].
Jolly, W.M., Brenner, J. L. and Long, A. (2025). SimpleFFMC: a new calculator for fine fuel moisture content. SFE Fact Sheet 2016-1. Available from: https://ccmedia.fdacs.gov/content/download/72994/file/SimpleFFMC_final_report_Rev2.pdf [accessed: 16.08.2025].
Kendon, M., McCarthy, M., Jevrejeva, S., Matthews A., Williams, J., Sparks, T. and West, F. (2023). State of the UK climate 2022. International Journal Climatology, 43, 1-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8167.
Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge (2022). Strategic guidelines for wildland fire management in Spain. Available from: https://www.miteco.gob.es/content/dam/miteco/es/biodiversidad/temas/incendios-forestales/strategic_guidelines_wildland_fire_management_2022_tcm30-522093.pdf [accessed: 02.09.2025].
Morvan, D. (2015). Numerical study of the behaviour of a surface fire propagating through a firebreak built in a Mediterranean shrub layer. Fire Safety Journal, 71, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.11.012.
National Strategy in USA (2014). The final phase in the development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. Department of the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. Available from: https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/strategy/strategy/CSPhaseIIINationalStrategyApr2014.pdf [accessed: 02.09.2025].
Ortega, M., Rodríguez y Silva, F. and Molina, J. (2024). Modeling fuel break effectiveness in southern Spain wildfires. Fire Ecology, 20, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-024-00270-2.
Papanikolaou, D., Arvanitakis, S., Papanikolaou, I., Lozios, S., Diakakis, M., Deligiannakis, G., Dimitropoulou, M. and Georgiou, K. (2013). Local Action Plans for forest fire prevention in Greece: Existing situation and a proposed template based on the collaboration of academics and public policy makers. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 15. Vienna: European Geosciences Union General Assembly, EGU2013-10555. Available from: https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2013/EGU2013-10555.pdf [accessed: 28.08.2025].
Pereira-Pires, J.E., Aubard, V., Ribeiro, R.A., Fonseca, J.M., Silva, J.M.N. and Mora, A. (2020). Semi-automatic methodology for fire break maintenance operations detection with Sentinel-2 imagery and artificial neural network. Remote Sensing, 12, 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12060909.
Rothermel, R.C. (1972). A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Research Paper INT-115. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Available from: https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_int/int_rp115.pdf [accessed: 03.09.2025].
Russo, L., Russo, P. and Siettos, C.I. (2016). A complex network theory approach for the spatial distribution of fire breaks in heterogeneous forest landscapes for the control of wildland fires. PLoS ONE, 11, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163226.
Rustad, L., Campbell, J., Dukes, J. S., Huntington, T., Lambert, K. F., Mohan, J. and Rodenhouse, N. (2012). Changing climate, changing forests: The impacts of climate change on forests of the northeastern United States and eastern Canada. General Technical Report NRS-99. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-99.
Scottish Government (2023). Fire and rescue wildfire operational guidance. Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/fire-rescue-service-wildfire-operational-guidance/documents/ [accessed: 11.07.2025].
Schroeder, M.J. (1969). Ignition probability. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Office Report 2106-1. Fort Collins, CO. Available from: http://www.firemodels.org/downloads/behaveplus/publications/Schroeder_OR2106-1_1969.pdf. [accessed: 16.08.2025].
Seidl, R., Thom, D., Kautz, M., Martin-Benito, D., Peltoniemi, M., Vacchiano, G., Wild, J., Ascoli, D., Petr, M., Honkaniemi, J., Lexer, M.J., Trotsiuk, V., Mairota, P., Svoboda, M., Fabrika, M., Nagel, T.A. and Reyer, C.P.O. (2017). Forest disturbances under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 7, 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3303.
Tyburski, Ł. and Szczygieł, R. (2023). Rules for the construction of firebreaks along public roads in selected European countries. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A – Forestry, 65, 199-209. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2023-0020.
Wilson, A.A.G. (1988). Width of firebreak that is necessary to stop grass fires: Some field experiments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 682-687. https://doi.org/10.1139/x88-104.
Zong, X., Tian, X. and Wang, X. (2021). An optimal firebreak design for the boreal forest of China. Science of the Total Environment, 781, 146822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146822.