Climate change primarily impacts large cities which often struggle with the effects of violent weather phenomena. Creating climate−resilient urban environments requires top−down strategies, comprehensive action plans, and broad public support for initiatives that enhance urban resilience. This study was undertaken to examine the relationship between climate change awareness among residents and their multifaceted preferences for urban green space development related to the differentiation of social characteristics. The research was conducted in 2024 and involved a sample of 731 residents of Warsaw aged 18 to 65. Respondents’ perception of the importance of green infrastructure elements in their neighbourhoods was assessed, categorising them by their self−perceived levels of climate change awareness (low, medium, high). The results indicate that individuals with a high level of climate change awareness consistently rated various green elements – such as green squares, large parks, and green stripes – as more important and desired elements than those in other categories with statistically significant differences confirmed by the Mann−Whitney U test. Moreover, those with a higher climate change awareness showed a greater interest in implementing ecological solutions, such as flower meadows and rain gardens compared to individuals with lower awareness. This underscores a significant correlation between climate change awareness and support for green infrastructure. In conclusion, while urban green areas are critical, it is also important to acknowledge the role of green spaces and street greenery in adaptation to climate change integrated with the well−being of urban residents. Our study results meet the strategic guidelines and legal requirements for urban planning policies in the European Union which include increasing the share of green areas in cities and greater tree canopy coverage.

Albert, C., Aronson, J., Fürst, C., Opdam, P., 2012. Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: Requirements, approaches, and impacts. Landscape Ecology, 29: 1277-1285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0.
Arnberger, A., Eder, R., 2015. Are urban visitors’ general preferences for green-spaces similar to their preferences when seeking stress relief? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14: 872-882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.005.
Arnberger, A., Eder, R., Allex, B., Wallner, P., Weitensfelder, L., Hutter, H.P., 2024. Urban green space preferences for various health-related psychological benefits of adolescent pupils, university students and adults. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 98: 128396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128396.
Badyda, A., Lubiński, W., 2009. The influence of air pollution on pulmonary function test results in people living close to busy roads. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 18: 7-12.
Barreira, A.P., Andraz, J., Ferreira, V., Panagopoulos, T., 2023. Perceptions and preferences of urban residents for green infrastructure to help cities adapt to climate change threats. Cities, 141: 104478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104478.
Bernat, S., 2007. Rewitalizacja dolin rzecznych w miastach. (Revitalization of river valleys in cities). In: U. Myga-Piątek, ed. Doliny rzeczne: Przyroda-Krajobraz-Człowiek. Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego VII. Sosnowiec: Komisja Krajobrazu Kulturowego PTG, pp. 255-265.
Berto, R., 2005. Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25: 249-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001.
Berto, R., 2014. The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4 (4): 394-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040394.
Bubeck, P., Botzen, W.J., Aerts, J.C., 2012. A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis, 32: 1481-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x.
Bullock, C.H., 2008. Valuing urban green space: Hypothetical alternatives and the status quo. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51: 15-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701712242.
Chang, J., Wu, C.C., Chang, C.Y., 2024. Landscape naturalness and restoring benefit: A connection through bird diversity. Urban Ecosystems, 27: 41-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01425-w.
Chen, T., He, J., Lu, X., She, J., Guan, Z., 2016. Spatial and temporal variations of PM2.5 and its relation to meteorological factors in the urban area of Nanjing, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13: 921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13090921.
Choumert, J., Salanié, J., 2008. Provision of urban green spaces: Some insights from economics. Landscape Research, 33: 331-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390802045996.
Dec, P., Wysocki, J., 2023. Wyzwania w obszarze finansowania ekoinwestycji w polskich miastach a perspektywa ESG. In: B. Ocicka, K. Gemra, eds. Zrównoważona transformacja: stan i uwarunkowania w kontekście ESG. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza, pp. 79-100.
Derkzen, M.L., van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Verburg, P.H., 2015. Review: Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high-resolution data of urban green space: An assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52: 1020-1032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12469.
Downton, P., Jones, D., Zeunert, J., Roös, P., 2017. Biophilic design applications: Putting theory and patterns into built environment practice. KnE Engineering, 2 (2): 59-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v2i2.596.
EC, 2011. Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Cities of tomorrow – Challenges, visions, ways forward. European Commission. DOI: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2776/41803.
European Parliament and the Council, 2024. Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and the Council of 24 June 2024 on nature restoration and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869.
Feest, A., Aldred, T.D., Jedamzik K., 2010. Biodiversity quality: A paradigm for biodiversity. Ecological Indicators, 10: 1077-1082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.04.002.
Fornal-Pieniak, B., Pawełkowicz, M., Ollik, M., Podlasek, A., Kiersnowska, A., Winkler, J., Koda, E., Vaverková, M.D., 2024. Heavy metal loading from transport using the indication species Festuca ovina L. Environmental Development, 54: 101133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101133.
Frantzeskaki, N., 2019. Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities. Environmental Science and Policy, 93: 101-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033.
Gehrels, H., van der Meulen, S., Schasfoort, F., Bosch, P., Brolsma, R., van Dinther, D., Geerling, G.J., Goossens, G.J., Jacobs, C., de Jong, M., Kok, S., Massop, H., Osté, L., Pérez-Soba, M., Rovers, V., Smit, A., Verweij, P., de Vries, B., Weijers, E., 2016. Designing green and blue infrastructure to support healthy urban living. Utrecht: TO2 Federatie, 109 pp.
Gersonius, B., Ashley, R., Salinas-Rodríguez, C., Rijke, J., Radhakrishnan, M., Zevenbergen, C., 2016. Flood resilience in Water Sensitive Cities: Guidance for enhancing flood resilience in the context of an Australian water sensitive city. Clayton: Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, 77 pp.
Grothmann, T., Reusswig, F., 2006. People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 38: 101-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6.
Herzog, T.R., Black, A.M., Fountaine, K.A., Knotts, D.J., 1997. Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17 (2): 165-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0051.
Horwood, K., 2011. Green infrastructure: reconciling urban green space and regional economic development: Lessons learnt from experience in England’s north-west region. Local Environment, 16: 963-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.607157.
Iojă, C.I., Badiu, D.L., Haase, D., Hossu, A.C., Ni?ă, M.R., 2021. How about water? Urban blue infrastructure management in Romania. Cities, 110: 103084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103084.
Jabbar, M., Yusoff, M.M., Shafie, A., 2022. Assessing the role of urban green spaces for human well-being: A systematic review. GeoJournal, 87: 4405-4423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10474-7.
Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., De Maeyer, P., 2013. Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 33: 24-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x.
Kondo, M.C., Jacoby, S.F., South, E.C., 2018. Does spending time outdoors reduce stress? A review of real-time stress response to outdoor environments. Health and Place, 51: 136-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.03.001.
Lenzholzer, S., Carsjens, G.J., Brown, R.D., Tavares, S., Vanos, J., Kim, Y., Lee, K., 2020. Urban climate awareness and urgency to adapt: An international overview. Urban Climate, 33: 100667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100667.
Li, X.P., Fan, S.X., Kühn, N., Dong, L., Hao, P.Y., 2019. Residents’ ecological and aesthetical perceptions toward spontaneous vegetation in urban parks in China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 44: 126397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126397.
Lis, A., Iwankowski, P., 2021. Where do we want to see other people while relaxing in a city park? Visual relationships with park users and their impact on preferences, safety and privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73: 101532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101532.
Longato, D., Cortinovis, C., Albert, C., Geneletti, D., 2021. Practical applications of ecosystem services in spatial planning: Lessons learned from a systematic literature review. Environmental Science and Policy, 119: 72-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.001.
Lopez, A.L., De Marco, A., Anav, A., Sorrentino, B., Paoletti, E., Manzini, J., Hoshika, Y., Sicard, P., 2025. The 3-30-300 rule Compliance: A geospatial tool for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 261: 105396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105396.
Luz, A.C, Buijs, M., Aleixo, C., Metelo, I., Grilo, F., Branquinho, C., Santos-Reis, M., Pinho, P., 2019. Should I stay or should I go? Modelling the fluxes of urban residents to visit green spaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 40: 195-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.009.
Ma, Y., Brindley, P.G., Lange, E., 2022. The influence of socio-demographic factors on preference and park usage in Guangzhou, China. Land, 11 (8): 1219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081219.
Ma, Y., Brindley, P.G., Lange, E., 2024. Comparison of urban green space usage and preferences: A case study approach of China and the UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 249: 105112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105112.
Macháč, J., Brabec, J., Arnberger, A., 2022. Exploring public preferences and preference heterogeneity for green and blue infrastructure in urban green spaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 75: 127695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127695.
Moniuszko, H., Popek, R., Nawrocki, A., Stankiewicz-Kosyl, M., Grylewicz, S., Podoba, S., Przybysz, A., 2024. Urban meadow – a recipe for long-lasting anti-smog land cover. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 26 (12): 1932-1941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2024.2367137.
Nordh, H., Alalouch, C., Hartig, T., 2011. Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10: 95-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.003.
Ode Sang, Ĺ., Knez, I., Gunnarsson, B., Hedblom, M., 2016. The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 18: 268-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.008.
Patarkalashvili, T.K., 2017. Urban forests and greenspaces of Tbilisi and ecological problems of the city. Annals of Agrarian Science, 15: 187-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2017.03.003.
Paudel, S., States, S.L., 2023. Urban green spaces and sustainability: Exploring the ecosystem services and disservices of grassy lawns versus floral meadows. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 84: 127932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127932.
Pochodyła, E., Jaszczak, A., Illes, J., Kristianova, K., Joklova, V., 2022. Analysis of green infrastructure and nature-based solutions in Warsaw – selected aspects for planning urban space. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae, 25: 44-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ahr-2022-0006.
Popek, R., Fornal-Pieniak, B., Dąbrowski, P., Chyliński, F., 2023. The role of spontaneous flora in the mitigation of particulate matter from traffic roads in an urbanised areas. Sustainability, 15: 7568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097568.
Popek, R., Roy, A., Mandal, M., Przybysz, A., Drążkiewicz, K., Romanowska, P., Sarkar, A., 2024. Enhancing urban sustainability: How spatial and height variability of roadside plants improves pollution capture for greener cities. Sustainability, 16 (24): 11131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411131.
Roberts, H., Kellar, I., Conner, M., Gidlow, C., Kelly, B., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., McEachan, R., 2019. Associations between park features, park satisfaction and park use in a multi-ethnic deprived urban area. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 46: 126485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126485.
Schneider, A.E., Neuhuber, T., Zawadzki, W., 2024. Understanding citizens’ willingness to contribute to urban greening programs. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 95: 128293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128293.
Selanon, P., Chuangchai, W., 2023. The importance of urban green spaces in enhancing holistic health and sustainable well-being for people with disabilities: A narrative review. Buildings, 13 (8): 2100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082100.
Song, Y., 2011. Ecological city and urban sustainable development. Procedia Engineering, 21: 142-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.1997.
Stangierska, D., Fornal-Pieniak, B., Szumigała, P., Widera, K., Żarska, B., Szumigała, K., 2023. Green physical activity indicator: health, physical activity and spending time outdoors related to residents preference for greenery. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20: 1242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021242.
Stangierska, D., Kowalczuk, I., Juszczak-Szelągowska, K., Widera, K., Ferenc, W., 2022. Urban environment, green urban areas, and life quality of citizens – the case of Warsaw. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (17): 10943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710943.
Sturiale, L., Scuderi, A., Timpanaro, G., 2023. Citizens’ perception of the role of urban nature-based solutions and green infrastructures towards climate change in Italy. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11: 1105446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1105446.
Swoczyna, T., Jastrzębska, J., Rosłon-Szeryńska, E., 2024. Changes in air water vapour pressure, relative humidity and carbon dioxide concentration in summer on the city outskirts. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25 (3): 163-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/178331.
TIBCO Software Inc., 2017. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13. Available from: http://statistica.io.
Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A., Zelson, M., 1991. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11 (3): 201-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7.
Wałęga, A., 2015. Koncepcja socjohydrologii w analizie zagrożenia powodziowego. (The concept of socio-hydrology in the flood risk analysis). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Formatio Circumiectus, 14 (3): 175-189. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15576/ASP.FC/2015.14.3.175.
Wang, H., Dai, X., Wu, J., Wu, X., Nie, X., 2019. Influence of urban green open space on residents’ physical activity in China. BMC Public Health, 19: 1093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7416-7.
Wang, W., Wu, T., Li, Y., Xie, S., Han, B., Zheng, H., Ouyang, Z., 2020. Urbanization impacts on natural habitat and ecosystem services in the Guangdong- Hong Kong-Macao ‘Megacity’. Sustainability, 12: 6675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166675.
Wiatkowski, M., Kózka, K., Wiatkowska, B., 2016. Analiza stanu świadomości zagrożenia zjawiskiem powodzi na obszarze zlewni rzeki Biała Głuchołaska. (Analysis of the state of consciousness of risk of floods phenomenon in cross-border area of Biała Głuchołaska river basin). Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 461: 210-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2016.461.20.
WHO, 2022. Report – WHO Air Quality Database (Update 2022). World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/air-pollution/who-air-quality-database/2022 [accessed: 17.06.2024].
Wu, C.C., O’Keefe, J., Ding, Y., Sullivan, W.C., 2024. Biodiversity of urban green spaces and human health: a systematic review of recent research. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 12: 1467568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1467568.
Yao, W., Zhang, X., Gong, Q., 2021. The effect of exposure to the natural environment on stress reduction: A meta-analysis. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 57: 126932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126932.
Zhou, W., Wang, J., Cadenasso, M.L., 2017. Effects of the spatial configuration of trees on urban heat mitigation: A comparative study. Remote Sensing of Environment, 195: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.043.