The effect of timber harvesting in thinning of pine stands Pinus sylvestris L. on efficiency of extraction using an agricultural tractor with a self−loading trailer
Wpływ technologii pozyskiwania drewna w trzebieży drzewostanów sosnowych Pinus sylvestris L. na efektywność zrywki kłód ciągnikiem rolniczym z przyczepą samozaładowczą
Sylwan 168 (7):478-490, 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2024030Available online: 2024-08-11
Open Access (CC-BY)
cut−to−length method • forwarding • late thinning • time study • work cycle • work productivity
The aim of this study was to compare basic efficiency parameters in forwarding of logs felled using a harvester and chain saws. Logs of 4.0 m in length came from late thinnings of pine stands and they were extracted with an 86 kW agricultural tractor with a self−loading trailer of 9500 kg load capacity. Analyses included the load, extraction distance, organizational structure of operation time, duration of the extraction cycle, as well as productivity in the operation time. It was also verified whether there is a relationship between the distance covered to collect log loads and the duration of the extraction cycle and the duration of the loading operation. These values were recorded during 27 extraction cycles for logs felled using a harvester and 25 extraction cycles for logs felled using chain saws. The extraction distance for logs felled using a harvester was 250 m, while for chain saw−felled logs it was 200 m. The mean load of logs felled using a harvester and those chain saw−felled was comparable (6.2−6.4 m³). The distance covered to collect the load of logs felled using a harvester was statistically significantly shorter than that for chain saw−felled logs. Within the structure of operation work time the greatest share accounted for loading time (almost 50 and 60% for logs felled using a harvester and chain saws, respectively). The duration of the extraction cycle for chain saw−felled logs was almost 33 min. and it was statistically significantly longer than the duration of the extraction cycle for logs felled using a harvester (24.5 min.). Extraction productivity in the operation time for logs felled using a harvester was over 15 m³·h–1 and it was statistically significantly greater than extraction productivity recording for chain saw− felled logs (almost 12 m³·h–1). In the case of both log harvesting technologies a weak, statistically non−significant correlation was found between the distance covered to collect the load and the duration of the extraction cycle. A similar situation was observed in the case of the distance and duration of loading for chain saw−felled logs, whereas for logs felled using a harvester no correlation between these variables was recorded.
Akay, A.E., 2005. Using farm tractors in small-scale forest harvesting operations. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 1 (2): 196-199.
Bodył, M., 2022. Rozmiar pozyskania maszynowego w Polsce. Drwal, 4: 24-28.
Cataldo, M.F., Proto, A.R., Macri, G., Zimbalatti, G., 2020. Evaluation of different wood harvesting systems in typical Mediterranean small-scale forests: a Southern Italian case study. Annals of Silvicultural Research, 45 (1): 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12899/asr-1883.
Dudek, T., Janas, D., 2022. The productivity and the costs forwarding wood of a farm tractor with a trailer in late thinning and cutting in gaps of forests. Forests, 13: 1309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13081309.
Gagliardi, K., Ackerman, S., Ackerman, P., 2020. Multi-product forwarder-based timber extraction: time consumption and productivity analysis of two forwarder models over multiple products and extraction distances. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 41 (2): 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5552/crojfe.2020.736.
Ghaffariyan, M.R., 2022a. An overview of work productivity evaluation of farm tractors in timber skidding operations. Silva Balcanica, 23 (1): 21-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/silvabalcanica.22.e82383.
Ghaffariyan, M.R., 2022b. Work productivity assessment of small forwarders in forest operations: An international review. Silva Balcanica, 23 (2): 55-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/silvabalcanica.22.e91143.
Grieger, A., Sędłak, P., Stawicki, T., Lewaszkiewicz, Ł., 2016. Analiza wydajności wywozu drewna ze zrębu w zależności od rodzaju środka transportu. (Performance analysis of export of wood in relation from the kind of transport). Autobusy, 6: 574-577.
Grodecki, J., 1996. Czy musimy obawiać się drogich maszyn zrywkowych? Przegląd Leśniczy, 1: 10-11.
Gülci, S., 2020. Productivity of a farm tractor with single drum winch during whole-tree timber extraction. Šumarski List, 144 (1-2): 35-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.144.1-2.4.
Gülci, S., Büyüksakalli, H., Taş, I., Akay, A.E., 2018. Productivity analysis of timber skidding operation with farm tractor. European Journal of Forest Engineering, 4 (1): 26-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.428397.
Jodłowski, K., 1997. Kilka słów o eksploatacji forwarderów. Las Polski, 12: 18-20.
Kormanek, M., Fiszer, M., 2018. Analysis of performance of short tree logging with farm tractor and logging trailer. Agricultural Engineering, 22 (2): 29-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agriceng-2018-0013.
Kulak, D., Szewczyk, G., Stańczykiewicz, A., 2023. Productivity and working time structure of timber forwarding in flatland thinned pine stand with the use of farm tractors. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 44 (1): 57-67. DOI: .
Laitila, J., Asikainen, A., Nuutinen, Y., 2007. Forwarding of whole trees after manual and mechanized felling bunching in pre-commercial thinnings. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 18 (2): 29-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2007.10702548.
Leszczyński, K., Stańczykiewicz, A., Kulak, D., Szewczyk, G., Tylek, P., 2021. Estimation of productivity and costs of using a track mini-harvester with a stroke head for the first commercial thinning of a Scots pine stand. Forests, 12 (7): 870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070870.
Lundbäck, M., Häggström, C., Nordfjell, T., 2021. Worldwide trends in the methods and systems for harvesting, extraction and transportation of roundwood. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 32 (3): 202-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2021.1906617.
Macri, G., De Rossi, A., Papandrea, S., Micalizzi, F., Russo, D., Settineri, G., 2017. Evaluation of soil compaction caused by passages of farm tractor in a forest in southern Italy. Agronomy Research, 15 (2): 478-489.
Magagnotti, N., Spinelli, R., 2011. Financial and energy cost of low-impact wood extraction in environmentally sensitive areas. Ecological Engineering, 37 (4): 601-606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.12.021.
Malinen, J., Laitila, J., Väätäinen, K., Viitamäki, K., 2016. Variation in age, annual usage and resale price of cut-to-length machinery in different regions of Europe. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 27 (2): 95-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2016.1171964.
Manner, J., Palmroth, L., Nordfjell, T., Lindroos, O., 2016. Load level forwarding work element analysis based on automatic follow-up data. Silva Fennica, 50 (3): 1546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1546.
Mederski, P.S., Karaszewski, Z., Rosińska, M., Bembenek, M., 2016. Dynamika zmian liczby harwesterów w Polsce oraz czynniki determinujące ich występowanie. (Dynamics of harwester fleet change in Poland and factors determining machine occurrence). Sylwan, 160 (10): 795-804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2016030.
Moskalik, T., Borz, S.A., Dvořák, J., Ferencik, M., Glushkov, S., Muiste, P., Lazdin¸š, A., Styranivsky, O., 2017. Timber harvesting methods in Eastern European countries: A review. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 38 (2): 231-241.
Mousavi, R., Naghdi, R., 2014. Comparison of Productivity and cost of timber extraction by farm tractor, skidding vs. forwarding in northern Iran. HortFlora Research Spectrum, 3 (3): 201-210.
Naskrent, B., Polowy, K., Grzywiński, W., Sobczak, A., 2019. Zrywka drewna średniowymiarowego w drzewo-stanach trzebieżowych przy użyciu ciągnika rolniczego z przyczepą nasiębierną. (Timber extraction in thinned stands using agricultural tractor coupled with a trailer with a hydraulic crane). Sylwan, 163 (2): 121-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2018109.
Nordfjell, T., Björheden, R., Thor, M., Wästerlund, I., 2010. Changes in technical performance, mechanical availability and prices of machines used in forest operations in Sweden from 1985 to 2010. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 25: 382-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2010.498385.
Nurminen, T., Korpunen, H., Uusitalo, J., 2006. Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fennica, 40: 335-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.346.
Paschalis, P., Porter, B., 1994. Próba oceny uszkodzeń drzew w wyniku prac zrywkowych w sosnowych drzewo-stanach przedrębnych. (An attempt at assessment of tree injuries as resulted from skidding operations in premature Scots pine stands). Sylwan, 9: 17-21.
PN BN-76/9195-01, 1982. Maszyny rolnicze. Podział czasu pracy. Symbole i określenia.
Portal Leśno-Drzewny, 2023. Portal Leśno-Drzewny. Warszawa: Państwowe Gospodarstwo Leśne Lasy Państwowe. Available from: http://drewno.zilp.lasy.gov.pl/drewno/informacja_o_realizacji_sprzedazy_drewna_w_pgl_lp_w_latach_2018-2022.pdf [accessed: 16.02.2024].
Porter, B., 1998. Ekologiczne aspekty prac zrywkowych. Przegląd Techniki Rolniczej i Leśnej, 7: 17-19.
Proto, A.R., Macrě, G., Visser, R., Harrill, H., Russo, D., Zimbalatti, G., 2018. Factors affecting forwarder productivity. European Journal Forest Research, 137: 143-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-017-1088-6.
Rozporządzenie, 2012. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska oraz Ministra Gospodarki z dnia 2 maja 2012 r. w sprawie określenia gęstości drewna. Dz.U. 2012 poz. 536.
Rzadkowski, S., 1995. Wydajność oraz koszty zrywki drewna forwarderem i przyczepy kłonicowej agregatowanej z ciągnikiem rolniczym. Przegląd Techniki Rolniczej i Leśnej, 7: 8-10.
Spinelli, R., Magagnotti, N., Pari, L., De Francesco, F., 2015. A comparison of tractor-trailer units and high-speed forwarders used in Alpine forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30 (5): 470-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1012113.
Spinelli, R., Owende, P.M.O., Ward, S.M., Tornero, M., 2004. Comparison of short-wood forwarding systems used in Iberia. Silva Fennica, 38 (1): 85-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.437.
Stańczykiewicz, A., Leszczyński, K., Sowa, J.M., Kulak, D., Szewczyk, G., 2016. The efficiency of timber harvesting using the Hypro 450 processor combined with a farm tractor. In: A. Gendek, T. Moskalik, eds. From theory to practice: Challenges for forest engineering. Proceedings and Abstracts of the 49th Symposium on Forest Mechanization. Warsaw, pp. 330.
Suwała, M., 1999. Uszkodzenia drzew i gleby przy pozyskiwaniu drewna w późnych trzebieżach drzewostanów sosno-wych. (Damages of trees and soil casued at timber harvesting in late thinnings of Pine stands). Prace Instytutu Badawczego Leśnictwa, A, 873: 3-86.
Suwała, M., Rzadkowski, S., 2001. Wydajność pracy, koszty i uszkodzenia drzew przy pozyskiwaniu drewna w trzebieżach drzewostanów górskich. (Productivity, harvesting costs and tree damage in thinnings in mountain stands). Prace Instytutu Badawczego Leśnictwa, A, 1 (911): 85-111.
Szymaniak, P., 2020. Ciężarówki wożące drewno są notorycznie przeciążone. Resort klimatu nie widzi problemu. Dziennik Gazeta Prawna. Available from: https://forsal.pl/artykuly/1453377,ciezarowki-wozace-drewno-sa-notorycznie-przeciazone-resort-klimatu-nie-widzi-problemu.html [accessed: 16.04.2024].
Taş, I., Akay, A.E., 2020. Productivity analysis of modified farm tractors in forwarding industrial wood products. Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 20: 196-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/412018.
Tomczak, A., Wesołowski, P., Jelonek, T., Jakubowski, M., 2016. Utrata masy i zmiany gęstości średniowymiaro-wego surowca sosnowego pozyskanego i magazynowanego w okresie letnim. (Weight loss and green density changes of Scots pine pulpwood harvested and stored during the summer). Sylwan, 160 (8): 619-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2016041.
TIBCO Software Inc., 2017. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13. Available from: http://statistica.io.
Więsik, J., 2017. Jak tworzyć i efektywnie użytkować agregaty zrywkowe z przyczepą nasiębierną. Część 1. Opis procesu zrywki nasiębiernej i zasady tworzenia agregatu. (Wood hauling aggregate with self-loading trailer. Principles of creation and effective use. Part 1. Description of wood forwarding process and principles of machine aggregation). Technika Rolnicza Ogrodnicza Leśna, 4: 18-21. Available from: https://tech-rol.eu/images/Archiwum_X/2019/05/trol_JW4_2017.pdf [accessed: 23.04.2024].
Więsik, J., 2022. Relacje oparte na wiedzy. Drwal, 9: 5-8.
Zarządzenie, 2019. Warunki techniczne – zasady przygotowania do pomiaru, pomiar, obliczanie miąższości i cecho-wanie surowca drzewnego. Załącznik nr 2 do Zarządzenia nr 51 DGLP z dnia 30.09.2019 r. Warszawa: Dyrekcja Generalna Lasów Państwowych, 14 pp. Available from: https://drewno.zilp.lasy.gov.pl/drewno/Normy/2._zasady_przygotowania_do_pomiaru_-_ujednolicono_wg_zarz_54-2020_v3.pdf [accessed: 26.04.2024].
Zychowicz, W., Kasprzyk, K., 2014. Effectiveness of agricultural tractor utilization in the wood skidding and forwarding. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW Agriculture (Agricultural and Forest Engineering), 63: 113-123.