How socio−economic factors influence public perceptions of forests: A case study from the Katowice Metropolitan Area, Poland
Wpływ czynników społeczno−ekonomicznych na postrzeganie lasów przez społeczeństwo: studium przypadku z obszaru metropolitalnego Katowic w Polsce
Abstract: The Upper Silesia region, one of the most industrialised and densely populated areas in the country, faces significant challenges in promoting public participation in decision−making and forest management. Katowice, the region’s capital, is a unique case, characterised by high forest cover, reaching approximately 42% of the city’s area. Due to its long industrial history, forests in Upper Silesia are critical for mitigating environmental damage, improving air quality, and maintaining ecological balance. However, misinformation on social media about forestry practices and strict EU legal requirements have led to sporadic tensions between the public and forest authorities, highlighting the need to rebuild public trust. In response to the growing demand for cultural ecosystem services, a pilot programme of ‘social forests’ was launched in Katowice at the beginning of 2024, similar to initiatives in other major urban regions, indicating a need for a deeper understanding of residents’ expectations. This pilot study aimed to investigate the influence of various socio−economic factors and attitudes on participation in forest management within the industrial region of Katowice. To this end, a pilot survey was conducted among 82 participants, using online and snowball sampling methods. The questionnaire assessed demographics, attitudes towards forests, awareness of ecosystem services, willingness to participate, and level of trust. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was acceptable, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.806. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi−square tests, multinomial logistic regression, and decision tree analysis, allowing for a deeper exploration of the relationships. The results reveal a strong dominance of recreational and health motivations: 85% of respondents visit forests for relaxation, health, and fresh air, and 71.9% to escape urban pollution. These motivations are strongly associated with a greater willingness to participate in nature conservation, unlike visits driven by cultural or heritage reasons. Despite this, 72% of respondents were not interested in participating in forest programmes, and over 80% were opposed to financially supporting conservation efforts. The level of education proved to be the most important predictor of involvement; individuals with higher academic qualifications (
e.g., Master’s or scientific degrees) were more likely to participate. Income level did not have a statistically significant relationship with the willingness to financially support forest activities (
p=0.997). Moreover, a one−unit increase in ecological awareness increased the probability of involvement in forest conservation by 1.8 times, confirming the importance of education. Regarding information sources, 70% of respondents obtained knowledge from social media or friends, even though official channels were considered the most reliable (46%). A low level of trust in institutions also persists; for example, 30.5% strongly disagreed that payment systems were transparent. The findings suggest that forest policy aimed at increasing participation should focus on raising public awareness, providing non−financial incentives (
e.g., volunteering), and improving transparency and public trust in institutions responsible for the state of forests. These insights are particularly relevant for urban and post−industrial areas like Katowice, where maintaining clean and well−managed green spaces is crucial for encouraging pro−environmental behaviour.
Key words: barriers to participation, ecosystem services, institutional mistrust, social forests, social networks, urban areas, willingness to participate