Article

Water retention capacity of red−stemmed feathermoss Pleurozium schreberi Mitt.
Pojemność wodna rokietnika pospolitego Pleurozium schreberi Mitt.
ANNA KLAMERUS-IWAN, MUHAMMAD OWAIS KHAN, PRANAV DEV SINGH, AGATA WARCZYK, MAŁGORZATA STOPYRA
Sylwan 168 (2):146-157, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2024003
Available online: 2024-04-18
Open Access (CC-BY)
current water retention • forest floor • moss • retention reservoir • storage water capacity

Abstract
The forest has a high water retention capacity, which is due to dead wood but also to a layer of moss, forming clusters in the lower forest floor. Mosses use rhizoids to collect water from the soil, but they also use their aboveground parts to collect water in the form of vapour or raindrops. The aim of the present work was to investigate the impact of initial humidity on water retention capacity of fresh samples and maximum water capacity for dry samples. The research material used in the present study was collected in the Olkusz Forest District. The samples were cut into equal pieces of the same size. Each sample was weighed before and after rainfall simulation in laboratory conditions. The samples were divided into fractions of stems, rhizoids, and soil. The performed analyses demonstrated that the water retention capacity of moss is extremely important for the water cycle. The average sample capacity is 0.58 [g/g], which translates into 24% of the total rainfall. As much as a third of the rainfall is rainfall is retained by mosses that grow on the lower layer of the forest, which makes them an important part of the water cycle in nature. The experiments have additionally shown that the higher the initial moisture, i.e. the more water in the fresh moss samples collected with the lump of earth, the higher the maximum water retention capacity. The dependence of the initial moisture on the components of the sample structure is explained by 43.22% variation. As much as 56.78% of the variability of the initial moisture content may depend on other factors that were not included in this study. These may include a different number of rhizoids, but also the degree of their binding/bonding of the soil. On the other hand, the lack of correlation of the water retention capacity, either the current one or that related to the dried weight of the sample, with the structural components of the sample tells us a lot about the complexity of the link between the moss and the soil via the rhizoids. The results obtained in the present study are in line with the research on the hydrological properties of forest ecosystems; they also indicate that the role of moss in the forest is very important, but not yet fully understood.

Literature
Allen, S.T., Aubrey, D.P., Bader, M.Y., Coenders-Gerrits, M., Friesen, J., Gutmann, E.D., Guillemette, F., Jiménez-Rodríguez, C., Keim, R.F., Klamerus-Iwan, A., Mendieta-Leiva, G., 2020. Key questions on the evaporation and transport of intercepted precipitation. In: J.T. Van Stan, E. Gutmann, J. Friesen, ed. Precipitation partitioning by vegetation: A global synthesis. Cham: Springer, pp. 269-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29702-2_16.
Blume, T., van Meerveld, I., Weiler, M., 2017. The role of experimental work in hydrological sciences – insights from a community survey. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62 (3): 334-337. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1230675.
Błońska, E., Klamerus-Iwan, A., Łagan, S., Lasota, J., 2018. Changes to the water repellency and storage of different species of deadwood based on decomposition rate in a temperate climate. Ecohydrology, 11 (8): e2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2023.
Chang, M., 2012. Forest hydrology: An introduction to water and forests. Third edition. Taylor and Francis. Available from: https://books.google.pl/books?id=Zr60yyHEdVcC.
Dunkerley, D., 2000. Measuring interception loss and canopy storage in dryland vegetation: A brief review and evaluation of available research strategies. Hydrological Processes, 14 (4): 669-678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(200003)14:4%3C669::AIDHYP965%3E3.0.CO.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A., Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., 2006. Occurrence, prediction and hydrological effects of water repellency amongst major soil and land-use types in a humid temperate climate. European Journal of Soil Science, 57 (5): 741-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00818.x.
García-Carmona, M., Arcenegui, V., García-Orenes, F., Mataix-Solera, J., 2020. The role of mosses in soil stability, fertility and microbiology six years after a post-fire salvage logging management. Journal of Environmental Management, 262: 110287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110287.
Garcia-Estringana, P., Alonso-Blázquez, N., Alegre, J., 2010. Water storage capacity, stemflow and water funneling in Mediterranean shrubs. Journal of Hydrology, 389 (3-4): 363-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.017.
Gash, J.H., Lloyd, C.R., Lachaud, G., 1995. Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. Journal of Hydrology, 170 (1-4): 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02697-N.
He, X., He, K.S., Hyvönen, J., 2016. Will bryophytes survive in a warming world? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 19: 49-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2016.02.005.
Holder, C.D., Lauderbaugh, L.K., Ginebra-Solanellas, R.M., Webb, R., 2020. Changes in leaf inclination angle as an indicator of progression toward leaf surface storage during the rainfall interception process. Journal of Hydrology, 588: 125070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125070.
Johnstone, J.A., Dawson, T.E., 2010. Climatic context and ecological implications of summer fog decline in the coast redwood region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (10): 4533-4538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0915062107.
Jiao, Y., Du, F., Traas, J., 2021. The mechanical feedback theory of leaf lamina formation. Trends in Plant Science, 26 (2): 107-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.11.005.
Keesstra, S., Mol, G., De Leeuw, J., Okx, J., De Cleen, M., Visser, S., 2018. Soil-related sustainable development goals: Four concepts to make land degradation neutrality and restoration work. Land, 7 (4): 133. DOI: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/4/133.
Keim, R.F., Skaugset, A.E., Link, T.E., Iroumé, A., 2004. A stochastic model of throughfall for extreme events. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 8 (1): 23-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-8-23-2004.
Klamerus-Iwan, A., Błońska, E., Lasota, J., Waligórski, P., Kalandyk, A., 2018. Seasonal variability of leaf water capacity and wettability under the influence of pollution in different city zones. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9 (3): 455-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.11.006.
Klamerus-Iwan, A., Kozłowski, R., Sadowska-Rociek, A., Słowik-Opoka, E., Kupka, D., Giordani, P., Porada, P., Van Stan, J.T., 2023. Influence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on water storage capacity of two lichens species. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 71 (2): 139-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2023-0010.
Klamerus-Iwan, A., Szymański, W., 2017. Przestrzenno-czasowe zróżnicowanie pojemności wodnej koron drzew leśnych na przykładzie buka zwyczajnego. (Spatio-temporal variability of water storage capacity in forest canopies of European beech). Sylwan, 161 (02): 142-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2016027.
Klamerus-Iwan, A., Witek, W., 2018. Variability in the wettability and water storage capacity of common oak leaves (Quercus robur L.). Water, 10 (6): 695. DOI: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/6/695.
Kang, H., Graybill, P.M., Fleetwood, S., Boreyko, J.B., Jung, S., 2018. Seasonal changes in morphology govern wettability of Katsura leaves. PloS One, 13 (9): e0202900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202900.
Krupa, J., 1974. Struktura anatomiczna liści mchów a ich aktywność fizjologiczna. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej, 59 pp.
Leelamanie, D.A.L., Piyaruwan, H.I.G.S., Jayasinghe, P.K.S.C., Senevirathne, P.A.N.R., 2021. Hydrophysical characteristics in water-repellent tropical Eucalyptus, Pine, and Casuarina plantation forest soils. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 69 (4): 447-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2021-0027.
Yuqing, L., Xiaoshuang, L., Jing, Z., Lu, Z., Xiaojie, L., Ruirui, Y., Daoyuan, Z., 2021. Dehydration rates impact physiological, biochemical and molecular responses in desert moss Bryum argenteum. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 183: 104346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104346.
Lichner, L., Holko, L., Zhukova, N., Schacht, K., Rajkai, K., Fodor, N., Sándor, R., 2012. Plants and biological soil crust influence the hydrophysical parameters and water flow in an aeolian sandy soil. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 60 (4): 309-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10098-012-0027-y.
Limm, E.B., Dawson, T.E., 2010. Polystichum munitum (Dryopteridaceae) varies geographically in its capacity to absorb fog water by foliar uptake within the redwood forest ecosystem. American Journal of Botany, 97 (7): 1121-1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000081.
Llorens, P., Gallart, F., 2000. A simplified method for forest water storage capacity measurement. Journal of Hydrology, 240 (1-2): 131-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00339-5.
Lowe, M.A., McGrath, G., Leopold, M., 2021. The impact of soil water repellency and slope upon runoff and erosion. Soil and Tillage Research, 205: 104756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104756.
Papierowska, E., Mazur, R., Stańczyk, T., Beczek, M., Szewińska, J., Sochan, A., Ryżak, M., Szatyłowicz, J., Bieganowski, A., 2019. Influence of leaf surface wettability on the drop splash phenomenon. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 279: 107762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107762.
Porada, P., Giordani, P., 2021. Bark water storage plays key role for growth of Mediterranean epiphytic lichens. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4: 668682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.668682.
Porada, P., Van Stan, J.T., Kleidon, A., 2018. Significant contribution of non-vascular vegetation to global rainfall interception. Nature Geoscience, 11 (8): 563-567. DOI: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-018-0176-7.
R Core Team, 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.
Rosado, B.H., Holder, C.D., 2013. The significance of leaf water repellency in ecohydrological research: A review. Ecohydrology, 6 (1): 150-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1340.
Rütten, D., Santarius, K.A., 1993. Osmotic potentials of water-saturated mosses. Journal of Plant Physiology, 141 (6): 739-744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81584-1.
Sikorska, D., Papierowska, E., Szatyłowicz, J., Sikorski, P., Suprun, K., Hopkins, R.J., 2017. Variation in leaf surface hydrophobicity of wetland plants: the role of plant traits in water retention. Wetlands, 37: 997-1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0924-2.
Van Stan, J.T., Dymond, S.F., Klamerus-Iwan, A., 2021. Bark-water interactions across ecosystem states and fluxes. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4: 660662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.660662.
Wang, X.P., Zhang, Y.F., Hu, R., Pan, Y.X., Berndtsson, R., 2012. Canopy storage capacity of xerophytic shrubs in Northwestern China. Journal of Hydrology, 454: 152-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11157.
Xiao, B., Hu, K., Ren, T., Li, B., 2016. Moss-dominated biological soil crusts significantly influence soil moisture and temperature regimes in semiarid ecosystems. Geoderma, 263: 35-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.09.012.
Zou, C.B., Caterina, G.L., Will, R.E., Stebler, E., Turton, D., 2015. Canopy interception for a tallgrass prairie under juniper encroachment. PloS One, 10 (11): e0141422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141422.